Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
State of Odisha vs. M/s. Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. | Reopening of Assessment under Odisha Entry Tax Act, 1999
Facts
of the CaseThe Petitioner is the State of Odisha (represented by Mr.
Sunil Mishra, ASC for CT & GST) and the Opposite Party is M/s. Garware Wall
Ropes Ltd. (represented by Mr. U.C. Behura, Advocate).The Depa...
M/s The Ramaraju Surgical Cotton Mills Limited vs Additional Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise: Madras High Court Grants Relief for Transfer of ₹72.44 Lakh ITC Where GST Portal Blocked Timely Filing of FORM GST ITC-02A under Rule 41A
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s The Ramaraju Surgical Cotton
Mills Limited, was a registered assessee under the Goods and Services Tax
law bearing GSTIN 33AAACT4380D1ZX. Until August 2021, it had ten
registered ...
M/s. Chilika Fishing Materials & Co. vs State of Odisha – Fish Nets, Fishing Twine and Rope Made of HDPE/PP Covered Under Entry No. 23 of Part I and Liable to 1% Entry Tax Under the Orissa Entry Tax Act: Orissa High Court
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Chilika Fishing Materials
& Co., filed a revision petition challenging the order dated 1 August 2013
passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack. The Tribunal had allo...
Savita Chhabra vs State of Haryana – Anticipatory Bail Denied in 2,39,400 Alprazolam Tablets Case; Paper Transaction Trail and Commercial Quantity Allegations Necessitated Custodial Interrogation under Section 20 NDPS Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Savita Chhabra, approached the High Court
seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 682 dated 10.12.2021 registered at Police
Station Sector 32/33, Karnal. The proceedings arose from informa...
Mukut House Developers Private Limited vs Gurinder Singh Kairon & Anr. – Delhi High Court Case Law on Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11(5) Despite Objection of Insufficiently Stamped Agreement
Facts of the
CaseMukut House Developers Private
Limited, the petitioner, entered into a Collaboration Agreement dated 7
September 2011 with the respondents. Under the Agreement, the respondents were
required, inter a...
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited vs State of Telangana — CST Act Section 6A(1): Inter-Divisional Dispatch of Avionic Components for SU-30 MKI Aircraft Challenged as Non-Sale Job-Work Transfer; Writ Petitions Dismissed as Withdrawn After Resolution
Facts of the CaseHindustan Aeronautics Limited, through its Avionics Division
at Balanagar, Hyderabad, filed four writ petitions challenging separate
assessment proceedings dated 01 October 2018 issued by the Assistant...
Biplab Kumar Chowdhury vs Union of India & Ors. – Calcutta High Court Dismisses GST Tax Evasion PIL for Suppression of Material Facts and Misuse of Public Interest Litigation; Imposes ₹50,000 Costs
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Biplab Kumar Chowdhury, filed a
Public Interest Litigation alleging that the private respondents were engaged
in the construction business but were not paying GST, thereby evading tax....
M/s Apollo Gold Pattambi LLP vs State Tax Officer & Others – Kerala High Court Stays Recovery of Balance KVAT Tax During Pendency of Tribunal Appeal and Directs Disposal Within Six Months
Facts of the CaseM/s Apollo Gold Pattambi LLP was aggrieved by an assessment
order issued under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act for the assessment year
2012–13. The petitioner initially preferred an appeal before the ...
M/s. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited vs State of Telangana & Assistant Commissioner of CT (LTU) – CST Levy under Section 6A(1) on Inter-Division Transfer of Avionic Components for SU-30 MKI Aircraft; Writ Petitions Dismissed as Withdrawn After Resolution
Facts of the CaseM/s. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (“HAL”), through its
Avionics Division at Balanagar, Hyderabad, filed four writ petitions
challenging separate assessment proceedings dated 01.10.2018 issued by t...
P.R. Venkatraman vs Commissioner, Karur Corporation – Madras High Court Directs Statutory Committee to Refix Municipal Shop Rent After Hearing Lessee; ₹2.50 Lakh Part-Payment for Removal of Lock and Seal | Article 226
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, P.R. Venkatraman, was the lessee of
Shop No.5 situated at Covai Road, Karur. The shop had been taken through
auction and was being used for a small business. According to the petitione...