Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,829,226
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

M/s. Ramesh Javery & Co. vs State of Odisha – Assessment Order under Section 9C of the OET Act Quashed as Time-Barred | Limitation for Audit Visit Report under Section 9B(2) & Rule 11(5)(c) of the OET Rules

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 173
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Ramesh Javery & Co., challenged the assessment proceedings initiated under the Odisha Entry Tax Act before the High Court of Orissa. The principal grievance was that the asses...

Jakson Limited & Ors. vs State of West Bengal & Anr. – Calcutta High Court Quashes Cheating & Criminal Breach of Trust Proceedings in Pure Commercial Contract Dispute | Sections 406, 420 & 120B IPC | Section 482 CrPC

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 165
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Jakson Limited and its officers/directors, sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising from allegations of cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal conspiracy under Sections...

Gayatri Ventures vs State of Chhattisgarh – Reimbursement of Additional GST Liability Due to GST Rate Increase under Amended Contract Clause 2.17.1 | Chhattisgarh High Court | Writ Petition (T) No. 282 of 2022

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 164
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Gayatri Ventures, was awarded a work contract by the Water Resources Department of the State of Chhattisgarh through a work order dated 06.05.2022. At the time of issuance of the work o...

GG Associates vs State of Chhattisgarh & Others – Reimbursement of Additional GST Liability Due to Increase in GST Rate under Amended Contract Clause 2.17.1 | Chhattisgarh High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 224
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, GG Associates, was awarded a government contract by the Water Resources Department of the State of Chhattisgarh. At the time the work order was issued, GST on the contract was payable ...

Acambis Helpline Management Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Others – Cancellation of GST Registration Set Aside for Non-Speaking Order under Section 29 read with Section 39 of the CGST Act | Allahabad High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 139
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Acambis Helpline Management Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the business of manpower supply and was duly registered under the GST laws. The GST Department issued a show cause notice dated 02....

Rajinder Singh @ Lovely & Connected Matters vs State of Punjab – Regular Bail Granted in GST Evasion, Bogus ITC & Corruption Case under Sections 7, 7A & 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 201 & 120-B IPC

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 175
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, namely Rajinder Singh @ Lovely, Avtar Singh, Pawan Kumar Sharma @ Kala Pandit, Sachin Kumar, Randhir Singh, Balwinder Singh, and Ajay Kumar, filed separate petitions seeking regular ba...

Rajiv Dutta vs State of Punjab | Anticipatory Bail Granted in GST Tax Evasion Scam on Parity Principle under Section 438 CrPC and Prevention of Corruption Act

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 129
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, namely Rajiv Dutta, Kunal Verma and Charanjeet Singh Ghataure, filed petitions under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 8 dated 21.08.2020 registered...

Sant Kumar & Another vs State of Haryana – Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail in Alleged Fake ITC Fraud Case under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 201 | Economic Offences and Bail Principles

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 145
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners sought regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 201 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petition...

Prameela L. vs State of Kerala & Ors. – Kerala High Court Upholds Rejection of Legal Heirship Certificate to Adopted Daughter Without Valid Adoption under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 | Compassionate Appointment Case

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 138
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Prameela L., claimed to be the adopted daughter of late K. Gopalan, who allegedly took her into his care after the death of her biological parents and brought her up as his own daughte...

Brilltech Engineers Private Limited vs Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited – Delhi High Court Holds Section 21 Notice Requirement Satisfied and Appoints Arbitrator under Sections 9 & 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 152
Read More »
Facts of the CaseArmy Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) awarded a construction contract to Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited for a residential project at Greater Noida. The respondent subsequently awarde...